Hi Chad,

I can certainly understand that. Packaging software that is in a "perpetual
alpha-state" must be a challenge. Especially with the strict standard the
debian "stable" has.

I have no problem with using the packages from sid. And I thank you for all
the effort you have put into maintaining the packages so far.

Andrew Tait
System Administrator
Country NetLink Pty, Ltd
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.cnl.com.au
30 Bank St Cobram, VIC 3644, Australia
Ph: +61 (03) 58 711 000
Fax: +61 (03) 58 711 874

"It's the smell! If there is such a thing." Agent Smith - The Matrix

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chad Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:53 AM
Subject: Debian FreeRADIUS package and Woody


> Hi, all.  I've decided to withdraw the radiusd-freeradius* packages from
> Debian Woody (the upcoming release).  If history is any indicator, any
> snapshot of the tree I take will need a signifigant patch not long after
> it's taken.  Debian's standards are too high, and administrative software
> (and authentication in particular) is too important for me to allow that.
>
> It will remain in Sid (unstable), of course, in hopes we'll be ready for
> Woody+1.  I'll still keep the debian/ directory up-to-date, so builds from
> CVS should be possible with minimal changes.
>
> - chad
>
> --
> Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <url: http://www.advogato.org/person/cmiller/>
>   ``Having a smoking section in a restaurant is
>     like having a peeing section in a pool.''
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to