Hi Chad, I can certainly understand that. Packaging software that is in a "perpetual alpha-state" must be a challenge. Especially with the strict standard the debian "stable" has.
I have no problem with using the packages from sid. And I thank you for all the effort you have put into maintaining the packages so far. Andrew Tait System Administrator Country NetLink Pty, Ltd E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.cnl.com.au 30 Bank St Cobram, VIC 3644, Australia Ph: +61 (03) 58 711 000 Fax: +61 (03) 58 711 874 "It's the smell! If there is such a thing." Agent Smith - The Matrix ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:53 AM Subject: Debian FreeRADIUS package and Woody > Hi, all. I've decided to withdraw the radiusd-freeradius* packages from > Debian Woody (the upcoming release). If history is any indicator, any > snapshot of the tree I take will need a signifigant patch not long after > it's taken. Debian's standards are too high, and administrative software > (and authentication in particular) is too important for me to allow that. > > It will remain in Sid (unstable), of course, in hopes we'll be ready for > Woody+1. I'll still keep the debian/ directory up-to-date, so builds from > CVS should be possible with minimal changes. > > - chad > > -- > Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <url: http://www.advogato.org/person/cmiller/> > ``Having a smoking section in a restaurant is > like having a peeing section in a pool.'' > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html