At 04:29 PM 11/04/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Ron Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But I DO know what causes them - they're "Session Timer" packets - 
>
>  And not RFC standard...

If I had my way, all of my ISDN and K56 customers would finally come to their senses 
and purchase our ADSL services.

TAOS 7.0.28 release docs mention that ticket 4757 fixed a problem with the MAX unit 
sending "Navis Access logging transmissions to radius accounting", so I'm going to try 
upgrading to see if it fixes the basic problem.

I suppose I could write a script that would give me the answers I need after the fact 
- run through the syslog files and match usernames against classes...

>  I still don't understand why Ascend couldn't send an accounting
>packet with a fake user name.  That would have done the same thing,
>and would be MUCH easier to handle.
>
>  Alan Dekok.

Hmmm, couple things come to mind.....might tinker and see what happens if above update 
doesn't solve things....


>- 
>List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ron Grant, RHCE (Red Hat Linux Certified Engineer)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    or     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Convergence Network Research Ltd.   (604) 737-2113


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to