Never mind.... Didn't catch your earlier reply. :) Oops...sorry.
Brian J. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Brian Johnson > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Are you smarter than George W. Bush? > > > Once again, Why not limit who can post to the list to subscribers? > > Brian J. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Miquel van Smoorenburg > > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 8:41 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Are you smarter than George W. Bush? > > > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >20-Dec-02 at 13:41, Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > >> > > http://lists.cistron.nl/archives/freeradius-devel/2002/10/msg0 > 0107.html > > > >Thanks. Is there a difference in score between average regular posts > and > >those spams which slip through? Could the threshold be lowered? > > The cutoff score is the default, 5. I'm not sure about what exactly > gets rejected - the mail isn't actually filtered through spamassassin, > the script just calls 'spamc -c' to check if it is spam. If so it is > simply thrown away. > > Perhaps I should fix that so that you can read the score in the > headers of spam that slips through. Need to find /time/ for that > though, and I aften say I don't have enough of it, and now my > collegue has just told us he'll be trying his luck somewhere else, > so I'm not going to get any more time soon ... > > Mike. > -- > They all laughed when I said I wanted to build a joke-telling machine. > Well, I showed them! Nobody's laughing *now*! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
