OK. But I was under the impression that text fields had issues with indexing still. Am I wrong here?
(Yes I need to do some more reading on this issue :-) Peter On Sat August 2 2003 02:05, Guy Fraser wrote: > It has been brought up in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list, > buy the developers. > > The reason given is that "varchar(x)" checks to make sure the data is > not larger than 'x' bytes, but "text" does not. > > If the application handles the data size constraints there is no reason > for the database to check again. > > Guy > > Peter Nixon wrote: > >On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:53 am, Guy Fraser wrote: > >>I have the new release now. > >> > >>I see that there has been some work done with the postgres sql file, the > >>main difference between the new one and the one I setup was that I used > >>'text' instead of 'varchar(x)' because it is faster. > > > >Are you sure about this? Can you point me to some documentation? > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
