=?Windows-1252?Q?Pascal_S=E9guy?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You mean that the remote radius (proxy) is broken ? some could think > FR is broken :)
Those people would be wrong. The RFC's have defined the CHAP-Challenge attribute for many years. If a RADIUS server uses the authentication vector, even when a CHAP-Challenge attribute is in the packet, then that RADIUS server is crap. It's probably 6 years old, and is subject to attacks, due to security flaws in its implementation. Upgrade broken software. Breaking other (working) software to inter-operate with broken software is asking for trouble. > > It will work for you, but that patch will never go into the server. > > You find it so ugly ? The patch is nonsense. It breaks the server to inter-operate with other broken software. The patch will NEVER go into the server. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
