Dinko Korunic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the updated version - which is working well according to test
> vectors I've got from your old code. I hope I didn't break EAP-SIM
> :)

  I've just commited an update to the existing SHA1 code.  I realized
that I had hacked md4/md5, to use "uint32_t" rather than "unsigned
long", and hadn't done the same for sha1.c

  The new code passes my tests, and should pass yours, too.

  Alan DeKok.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to