> > > > hello, > > > > > > > > i got a problem with radrelay. > > > > its working and is relaying accounting data correctly to other radius > > > > servers, but the problem is that the detail-combined file(radrely-log) > > > > will grow infinitely. i dont know why, maybe its becaue i got many > > > > accounting data in cause of accounting alive packets (5kbyte in 1 > second), > > > > but im not really sure. > > > > Run a radius sniffer to check if radrelay is sending any accounting > packets and > > if it receives any accounting responses. Also since you run it through > strace > > you can check the file offsets in the corresponding system calls to see if > it > > moves forward in the file or if it's stuck. If it is check out the > corresponding > > detail file lines for anything strange. > > > > hi kostas, > > it seems that everything is working correctly besides the 'rotate problem'. > radrelay sends the accounting data and receives the finish response of > freeradius. > the destination radius server is filling the detail file of the client > (radrelay) and no strange behavior in the file is discoverable. also the > accounting data it is sending is up to date. > i think the only problem is the rotating. maybe there is no moment of a > succefull return of fcntl to return a nonlocked file, but also without file > locking in > radiusd.conf the problem persist. the other thing i would suppose is that > radrelay is never hiting the end of the file in cause of the fast filling > of the detail-combined file... > frustrating... > > best regards, > christian > > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > hi, i discovered the problem. the problem is that radrelay is never getting the EOF, becaue the detail file is filling to fast. besides that, radrelay works fine, but the data it is processing is after 10hours of runtime about 1hour old. i think the bottleneck isnt processing the file rather than the conection itself to the destination freeradius server, maybe this would much better perform if it would establish more than one connection simultaneously to feed the freeradiusserver. i dont know what to do now, i think i will build a new environment without keeping 2 freeradius server synchronous.
best regards, christian - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
