Paul Hampson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:57:10PM +0200, Thor Spruyt wrote: >> Looking into the libltdl directory, I don't see a Makefile, but only >> a Makefile.in and Makefile.am >> In 1.0.0-pre3, the libltdl directory does contain a Makefile! > > Check the list archives, the fix should be there somewhere.
Well, I found this: <QUOTE> OK, so why is it trying to build in 'libltdl', when you've obviously told it not to use the libltdl shipped with the system? What were your 'configure' options? What is the value of LIBLTDLPATH, in Make.inc? Alan DeKok. >/QUOTE> Doesn't tell me anything new does it? I didn't "tell it" anything. Just as in 1.0.0-pre3, I would expect configure to handle this properly. I'm still wondering why there's only Makefile.in and Makefile.am -- Regards, Thor Spruyt E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.thor-spruyt.com M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65 - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
