On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:15:37 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ** Reply to note from Nils =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F8nhovde?= > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:31:44 +0200 > > > > Hello, > > > > I am a bit puzzled that radiusd says "Ignoring deprecated > > command-line option -p" while usage() says: > > " -p port Bind to 'port', and not to the radius/udp, or > > 1646/udp." > > > > I must admit that I haven't read the list thoroughly for the last > > year or so, so can I have missed a discussion whether the -p option > > should work or not? > > > > Is there a reason why -p should not work? > > It's no longer implemented.
That's obvious. I'm interested in why the feature is removed, and what my alternatives to using it may be. > Instead, you can set the port to be used > in radiusd.conf. I want to override that (which, incidentally, radiusd.conf still states is possible), e.g. for testing purposes or the use of check-radiusd-config. -- best regards Nils Rønhovde Telenor Networks - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
