Paul Hampson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 04:34:30PM +0200, Thor Spruyt wrote: >> Will the patch in bug #122 be apllied so the changes are in 1.0.1? > > The only justification I can see to put this into 1.0.1 is if it's > invalid to have two Reply-Message attributes in a RADIUS reply.
All these things have already been discussed, but if need be... it's my opinion that ... - the server should NOT add it's own Reply-Message when the external script provides one - when running with -X, we can as well print out the reply attributes sent back for the reject - rejecting a user has nothing to do with failure of the external script - many users are experiencing the same issues because of the way it's handled now >> If it can't make 1.0.1, what has to be done in order to get it into >> the next release? > > A good and clear explanation why rlm_exec does not and cannot fufill > your requirement. Unless I am mistaken, Exec-Program-Wait is > deprecated, in favour of rlm_exec, so I'm not inclined towards > accepting enhancements to it myself. Well... rlm_exec actually has the very same problem (accepting is done properly, but rejecting is done poorly). I think that simply because something is deprecated doesn't mean that it doesn't matter that it's working bad. Since it's there... why not make it behave properly? All that has to be done is apply a patch :) > I speak only for myself here. Me too :) -- Regards, Thor Spruyt E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.thor-spruyt.com M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65 - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
