Hello, For accounting_stop packet it's better to use Acct-Session-Time because for a call that the same user do you can use this to seperate the calls. In this way you can handle a lot of calls that one user do. All this if you want to know about the calls one by one.
Kyriaki Gali, IT Applications Specialist Kinetix Tele.com Support Center, Tel & Fax: +30 2310 256140 GSM: +30 6947 723737 http://www.kinetix.gr e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Suzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Radius Free" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:09 AM Subject: Advice needed (Acct-Session-Id vs. User-Name) > > Hi, > > I need an advice. One of my collegues suggested to drop User-Name > for accounting purposes to avoid realm clashes (when CISCO > drops realms in some cases). > > He suggests to store Acct-Session-Id at authorisation and > then restore User-Name at accounting stop event to make accounting. > > He claims it's more accurate than to rely on User-Name. > > As this is completely novel idea, I'd liked to know community opinion. > Thank you! > > Sincerely yours, Roman A.Suzi > -- > - Petrozavodsk - Karelia - Russia - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
