Gerald Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do not misunderstood me: i'am not using "outbound" because of faith in > cisco. not at all :). i use it because it looks rfc conform - the examples > from cisco only second that.
Please go back and read what I wrote in my first response. The names are IRRELEVANT. The dictionaries matter only to the RADIUS server and it's configuration files. I could rename all of the attributes & valuess to random words from the dictionary, and it would make *no* difference to the clients. > it was my fault that i stumbled again over this (because i have done the > appropriate dictionary modifications more then once in the past) but this > time i asked myself (and afterwards the list) for the rfc-standard... Many, many, attributes and values in FreeRADIUS have slight differences from the RFC's. Many implementation decisions in FreeRADIUS do not follow the RFC's, either. On a positive note, it looks like FreeRADIUS will be referenced in an upcoming RFC. Some decisions made by Raghu a while back which didn't follow the RFC's ended up being better than the RFC suggestions. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html