On Thursday 10 November 2005 05:44 pm, Alan DeKok wrote: would it also do the same thing if I removed the simultaneous-use=1 check statement from the user group? until i can figure this out that would be my easiest thing still allowing writing to accounting for other purposes.
> Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I turn accounting off, is there a way we can still pass > > accounting through to our remote realms, or is it a global on/off > > switch that affects everyone? > > Yes. You can delete the "detail" and "sql" entries from accounting, > and it won't log accounting to the local machine, but it will still > proxy packets. > > > I do notice a number of error messages about 0 length stop packets being > > received and I assume they are rejected. > > Yes. That shouldn't affect anything, though. > > Alan DeKok. > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > -- Chuck "Windows?? You mean the thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition? Oh, that..." -- Lee Clarke - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html