"Dmitry V. Pleganoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for corrections, valgrind has shown MUCH less losses. > > ==9603== 21 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 27 of 124 > ==9603== at 0x1B90659D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:130) > ==9603== by 0x1D1A8E1F: ldap_instantiate (rlm_ldap.c:429)
Fixed. > ==9603== 45 bytes in 6 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 44 of 124 > ==9603== at 0x1B90659D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:130) > ==9603== by 0x1BB4708F: strdup (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) > ==9603== by 0x804ECF2: cf_item_parse (conffile.c:747) Fixed. > ==9603== 492 (108 direct, 384 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely > lost in loss record 64 of 124 > ==9603== at 0x1B90659D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:130) > ==9603== by 0x1BBB6EE6: (within /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) > ==9603== by 0x1BBB6788: __nss_database_lookup (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) > ==9603== by 0x1BE0A797: ??? > ==9603== by 0x1BB76A4B: getgrnam_r (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) Can't fix. > ==9603== 340 bytes in 5 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 81 of 124 > ==9603== at 0x1B906F75: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:175) > ==9603== by 0x1B8F2678: (within /lib/ld-2.3.2.so) > ==9603== by 0x1B8F294B: _dl_allocate_tls (in /lib/ld-2.3.2.so) > ==9603== by 0x1B93E24A: allocate_stack (in /lib/tls/libpthread-0.60.so) > ==9603== by 0x1B93DC54: pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1 (in Can't fix. Thanks for the report. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html