On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 14:36 +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > > It's a Slackware 10.1 (I think, could be 10) with a 2.6.14.3 kernel. > > Same happened with 2.4.29 and 2.6.12. > > Ok, so the FreeRadius executable should have only one PID since it's > running the new threading, unless you've got an old libc?
Hm. 2.3.4, not that old, but: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps u $(pgrep radiusd) USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5258 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? Ss 18:47 0:00 radiusd root 5259 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? S 18:47 0:00 radiusd root 5260 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? S 18:47 0:00 radiusd root 5261 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? S 18:47 0:00 radiusd root 5262 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? S 18:47 0:00 radiusd root 5263 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? S 18:47 0:00 radiusd root 5264 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? S 18:47 0:00 radiusd root 5978 0.0 0.2 16908 2140 ? S 18:57 0:00 radiusd > >> Hmm. What does "ps -ejf" (on Linux - translate for closest > equivalent on > >> other systems) say for these? > > > > root 25065 24736 23880 23880 0 15:11 ? 00:00:00 > [acct-ng.pl] <defunct> > > root 25073 23885 23880 23880 0 15:11 ? 00:00:00 > [acct-ng.pl] <defunct> > > > > ...so why do these have different parent PIDs (2nd column)? Could > "acct-ng.pl" be itself forking? What process are those PIDs? radiusds. Also, as a sidenote, I've tried with an empty bash script, same thing happens, it gets stuck as a zombie when called for accounting stop. -- George-Cristian Bîrzan Network Engineer _______________________________________ RCS & RDS Constanta Tel.: +40341.400.401 / +40341.400.402 Fax: +40341.400.450 http://www.rcs-rds.ro _______________________________________ Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
