=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Tom=E1s_A=2E_Rossi=22?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wish I could do that but I'm not that familiarized with FreeRADIUS > yet. No complains at all, just concede me the point and do not deny it > by comparing it with other commercial and worst-documented software, please.
Sorry, I can't concede that the docs are that bad, because many people think they're pretty good. I concede that *you* think they're bad, but that's your opinion, and only one of many. > I'm not taking it as bad as it sounds. Just don't see why an "endless > series of messages". You mean if you print a message for every request > of the kind? There is only a small amount of functionality in the server. It prints out messages describing that functionality. There is an *infinite* amount of things the server doesn't do. If we printed out a message about everything the server didn't do, that list would be infinite. That's what you're asking for, and that's why I'm saying "No.". I'm sorry this upset you. > Ok, I hope you aren't putting me in that bag. I believe 100% in your > explanations but not agree/understand 100% of them. That's fine. But recognize that you don't control what goes into the server. > I frequently post on other mailing lists of other open source and > commercial software and never been treated this way in any of them. Treated like what? Having someone disagree with you, and explain why? Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
