Laker Netman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any fundamental problems with modifying > rlm_sql to allow an arbitrary number (and potentially > source) of additional queries in relation to how it > interacts with the core FR server?
No, because those queries don't interact with the server core. > What I'm saying > is, are there any known issues or caveats preventing > this functionality from being added or is it just > resources and project priorities? Just time. See rlm_sql_log in the CVS snapshots. The method it uses for picking queries is simpler and more extensible than what's in rlm_sql. It was also written years after rlm_sql, and we've learned a bit since then. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html