Isn't there anyone who tried this implementation?
> >Hi! >if you are reffering to this line: >"account required pam_radius_auth.so debug" >than here is the explanation: > "The pam configuration can be: >... >auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_radius_auth.so [options] >... >account sufficient /lib/security/pam_radius_auth.so" > (this is taken from http://www.freeradius.org/pam_radius_auth/USAGE) > >On the other hand, I don't care if I don't use this module for accounting. As >a matter of fact, I tried in many configurations, even without using it for >accounting. >The main concern is to succed in authetincating the users!!! if anyone can >help me accomplish that, I would be happy and I will not mind about >accounting... > > > > >> >>Hi, >> >>> I don't understand why you are saying that "you are invoking >>> pam_radius_auth in the wrong place and for the wrong reason"...please, be >>> more specific and if you know the right configuration, enlight me! >>> >>> >> >#%PAM-1.0 >>> >> >auth required pam_securetty.so >>> >> >auth sufficient pam_radius_auth.so debug >>> >> >auth required /lib/security/pam_unix_auth.so >>> >> >account required pam_radius_auth.so debug >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >>explain >> >>alan >>- >>List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > >- >List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html