On Mon 08 Jan 2007 22:53, Alan DeKok wrote: > Peter Nixon wrote: > > Yep. rlm_sqlippool and rlm_sql_postgresql are 2 other modules which have > > huge changes in them.. Is it worth me spending some time tonight > > backporting them or should we just wait for 2.0? (sqlippool seems to be > > getting quite some interest of late) > > I think we should just wait for 2.0. I've been holding off on 2.0 for > a number of reasons, but I think we're better off releasing it earlier > rather than later.
I definitely agree. The blocker bugs that come to mind are the leak in radrelay (which u have provided a patch for and I have yet to find time to test properly) and the crash in threaded proxy mode (which I think you fixed recently.. again need to test..) I will test both of these things properly this week now that I have the postgresql and sqlipool issues out of the road. The other thing that comes to mind is the update to newer autotools... I am afraid someone else is going to have to take this one. Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
pgpGhl500aYiF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html