matthew zeier wrote: > I find that hard to believe since google found a number of hits > (http://tinyurl.com/2daram is a good example)
Which is in 1.1.5. I have already told you multiple times that it's known, and will be fixed in 1.1.6. Please read my messages. What *isn't* known is a double free bug in 2.0-pre0. As I said, I haven't seen it, and neither has anyone else. Responding that there is a known double-free bug in 1.1.5 is beside the point. The code in 1.1.5 is *very* different than 2.0. > This list has so far provided the least amount of help for any open source > tool I've ever used. Is this the way I should behave if I file a bug in Mozilla? "Stuff went wrong in 2.0, here's a pointer to a similar bug report in 1.5. Why haven't you people fixed it already?" Honestly? Is it such a shock when someone tells you that you need to participate in the solution to a problem that only you're seeing? > Since I'm running stock RHEL4, this should be easy to duplicate. Are you > suggesting that if Mozilla gave you a RHEL4 system, you'd be able to fix it? No. Maybe I can try, though. > If that's what you're saying, send me your public key and I'll have a host > online tonight. Attached. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEA2comcplgH4DPwo2LFc556rgya64F2a40k0JcayGf1eJlRRGd8BrDPFOuZamzsKPkZQDXufQ4qXDom55bcG7sgdOvgG3xsBwSV13X05uNoUb7Ak30MBZcqyYzjhbykt923XDTxg5x7Q4kBPSaeOkouQbbACsadwBzcnCfpSuod60= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html