Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: > Alan DeKok wrote: >> I don't think it was ever added. I'm not sure the functionality is >> even tested. >> >> i.e. Does it work? >> >> Alan DeKok. > > Read Groups in SQL ? Yes, very very well tested. It's horribly broken in > 1.*.* though, or at least it was for me. > > Unfortunately whoever modified rlm_sql in cvs head chose a very > inefficient querying system. > > First you query to pull out group membership, second you query to get > each groups check items, then to get each groups reply items ... It just > doesn't scale when a users a member of lots of groups. > > Previously you pulled out all the records for all the groups a user was > a member of in two queries, one for check items and one for reply items..
Yes. It worked for me this way until at least 1.1.6. You are right, Alan, - read_grops configuration checks were not in 1.1.x also, but they worked somehow. Starting from 2.0.0-pre only user checks are performed by default. The only way to make groups to be checked was the supposed patch. Or adding "Fall-Through=yes" for all user profiles in radcheck table which is not good. -- Sincerely Yours, Alexander - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html