Vincent Magnin wrote: > Well, > > I've writen a patch for realms.c and now, I've a better behaviour: ... > Does exist a better way to use the DEFAULT realm?
I think that patch is OK. The "ignore_default" and "ignore_null" configuration for the "realms" module were deleted because they were a bad way to implement failover or fallback. The new "unlang" does it much better. But this is a simple way to do fallback for a realm that doesn't require changes to the "realms" module. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
