Ranner, Frank MR wrote:
> I've noticed that NAS-Port is sometimes not sent, particularly in
> accounting requests. This caused the
> Accounting request to essentially be discarded.
Uh... no. The server doesn't work like that.
> What I figured was to
> use the source udp port as a
> pseudo nas-port.
This won't work.
> I did add some code to
> populate the Packet-Src-Port item,
You don't need to do that. The attribute exists if you reference it
as %{Packet-Src-Port}.
> and this did fix the accounting from
> with the Nortel switch I was testing. As it
> happened, each telnet session to the switch used a different console
> port, and the src port number reflected that.
Well, yes. NAS-Port is for *dial-in* port, or *switch* port. It is
*not* for telnet sessions.
You're trying to add NAS-Port to sessions that don't need it, don't
use it, and where it doesn't make sense.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
