Anders Holm escribió:
[snip]
rlm_pap: WARNING! No "known good" password found for the user.
Authentication may fail because of this. //Normal, i am not
willing to do PAP but mschapv2
<me> If you’re not using a module, disable it. All it’ll do is add
latency, delays and unnecessary log messages. Comment it out ...
++[pap] returns noop
rad_check_password: Found Auth-Type EAP
auth: type "EAP"
+- entering group authenticate
rlm_eap: Request found, released from the list
rlm_eap: EAP/mschapv2
rlm_eap: processing type mschapv2
+- entering group MS-CHAP
rlm_mschap: No Cleartext-Password configured. Cannot create
LM-Password.
rlm_mschap: No Cleartext-Password configured. Cannot create
NT-Password.
rlm_mschap: Told to do MS-CHAPv2 for glouglou with NT-Password
//does the 3 previous lines means there is an error? what does "No
Cleartext-Password configured means?
<me> it means, it cannot find a clear text password in the backend
data store, which it expects to do ..
// what does LM-Password means? and if it's error, how could i
correct it?
<me> Check your configuration. All depends on so many things ..
// ithought it was normal, as I am surewindows never sends
"cleartext-Password"
Oh, Windows sure has been using clear text passwords, so it then
also has a need to be backwards compatible with itself, right?
expand: --username=%{mschap:User-Name}-> --username=glouglou
//...???...
mschap2: d1
expand: --challenge=%{mschap:Challenge:-00} ->
--challenge=4a2a69e7929b2c03 //...???...
expand: --nt-response=%{mschap:NT-Response:-00}} ->
--nt-response=e9ea7e1669ef48501476149962484763f8f98b93fca2ced6}
//...???...
Exec-Program output: NT_KEY: 067F1C60B6DDB9D2802A458C4EFE22C1
//...???...
Exec-Program-Wait: plaintext: NT_KEY:
067F1C60B6DDB9D2802A458C4EFE22C1 //...???...
//negociation that is out of the range of my brain till now, but i
think ity's normal security negociation in windows system, and
there is no error here.
Exec-Program: returned: 0 //...???...
rlm_mschap: adding MS-CHAPv2 MPPE keys
++[mschap] returns ok
MSCHAP Success //...???... if MSCHAP Success, where is the matter
with this module???
<me> what makes you believe there is a problem at this stage?
++[eap] returns handled
} # server (null) //...???...
PEAP: Got tunneled reply RADIUS code 11
EAP-Message =
0x011200331a0311002e533d31303435323031393932463633443944424132303644424643343341413242354132313236344636
Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
State = 0x95b92b9094ab31501a0a30daea5106ca
PEAP: Processing from tunneled session code 0x81b78d8 11
EAP-Message =
0x011200331a0311002e533d31303435323031393932463633443944424132303644424643343341413242354132313236344636
Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
State = 0x95b92b9094ab31501a0a30daea5106ca
PEAP: Got tunneled Access-Challenge
++[eap] returns handled
Sending Access-Challenge of id 164 to 10.10.44.246 port 1042
EAP-Message =
0x0112004a1900170301003f9d2524cd5e275d581a614935870e9c19c11e3a4e05332e915ef1f0a46bed9a751bbc330d98db1e52e04119a926415da6ee52cb7e6cc6693a8f1bb8847a7af3
Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
State = 0xe8ed0301efff1a196c3b0024d8e45892 //...???... and then
What? and why its stops..???...
<me> why do I get the feeling that if Message-Authenticator is all
zeros, it is a “nope, not going to happen mate” type return,
effectively stopping any further processing. Why I have no idea ..
Alan??
[cut out bits that are not relevant, nor commented, nor anything.
Let’s trim messages folks. If it’s not used or relevant, get rid
of it.. It only takes space]
I'm agree, a good begining would be comment out all modules you're not
using. The instances of the modules are in sites-enabled/default and
sites-enabled/inner-tunnel (for peap and ttls).
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
