>While WPA and WPA2 does provide for >data-link encryption, it needs keying material to encrypt the >communication. It can use a pre-shared key (PSK) for this purpose, >but this has the drawbacks of communicating the key to the user and >configuration on the end users part.
So they don't want PSK. >The two downsides of this approach is similar to PSKs, in that you >have to have a mechanism to communicate the configuration information, >and the configuration is burdensome on the user. I have proposed this >solution to hotspot operators whom, after testing, have rejected it as >too difficult for the user. And configuring something that Microsoft calls Zero Configuration is too complicated. Use captive portal then. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html