Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote: > Ooooooo useful. Would you be adverse to a patch adding a policy section > that provided the requisite behavior for both Access-Accept and > Accounting-Request packets ? Or would you like two policy sections.
I'll look at the patch and see. > i.e. One that has a switch statement for packet type, or two different > policies. > > The advantage of the one policy is that it's listed with the same name > in the require sections of the default config. The disadvantage is the > added switch statement. Hm... yes. I don't have strong opinions on this subject. It may be better to let the CPU do a bit more work than the admin, and use a switch statement to keep the external name the same. > This is more of a general question for future patches... Do you want > policies to be self contained, or do you not mind if they sprawl a bit. "sprawl" ? Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html