Gary Gatten wrote:
If I understand you correctly – I respectfully submit you are
incorrect. When using VLSM / classless masks to define a NETWORK, you
are correct (I haven’t checked the math – just assuming you are
correct). However, when defining ACL type stuff, the proposed /29 would
be perfectly OK. That said, I’m speaking strictly of my experience with
routers, firewalls, etc. If FR supports this I can’t say for sure.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
you can not to use /29 for 8 IPs because 3 bits have exactly 8
combination ,..x000 is the network and ...x111 is the difusion ,then
really you have 6 IPs with /29, you need /28 16 combinations minus
two,min 14 IPs for 8 numbers.
I think we should stop the TCPIP training.
This is the freeradius list.
The user wants to know if /29 can be used.
The answer is yes.
--
Johan Meiring
Cape PC Services CC
Tel: (021) 883-8271
Fax: (021) 886-7782
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
