I think we're getting too far into the detail and losing sight of the problem I was trying to report initially.
I'd expect the only difference between the proxying to a remote server, and proxying to a virtual server to be efficency / ports used, not functionality, aka it's more efficnt to use virtual_server= rather than define a remote radius server, then have the virtual server listen on odd numbered ports on localhost. There seems to be a functionality difference when proxied to a virtual server. Tim 2009/12/21 Alan Buxey <a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk>: > Hi, > >> Not the default virtual server. The test virtual server >> The flow is client -> default virtual server acting as a proxy -> test >> virtual server >> If the test virtual server is configured as a remote radius server >> then things work great. If it's configured as a virtual server using >> the "virtual_server=name" then things break. > > test virtual server not setting the options byt he looks of it... > post-auth is called in that virtual server - so how should it be > getting/setting > that attribute? > > alan > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html