Cedric Hui wrote: > I believed I have the same issue as described in ID 18 "rlm_ldap > MAX_FAILED_CONNS logic and ldap response 19 constraint violation". I > would also like to see that "constraint violation" being handled as > RLM_MODULE_REJECT instead of RLM_MODULE_FAIL. Is it likely that > Adam's request be included in the next update?
Does the patch solve the problem? Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
