>> Ok, you're right, but in my case I know the client session can't last more 
>> than 24hrs.
>> So, for me it's ok to remove all *inactive* entries older than that.
>> 
>> But, as far as I know, this seems to be impossible with gdm pool.
>> So, what the "maximum_timeout" parameter is useful for ???

>  It sets the timeout when entries are expired.  Your tests (so you say)
>don't go for 24 hours... so that timeout doesn't apply.

Alan, that's wrong.

I've done my tests with an ad-hoc pool, with maximum_timeout set at 10 secs.
And the results I posted came from a new test session done the day after the 
first test.
(24 hrs >> 10 secs)

Why that timeout doesn't apply?


>> So I need a method to avoid my pool being filled up by missing acct-stop.
>  You were told a method which should work.  Try it.

Surely I'll switch to sql pool, but what I observe is that dbm pool are 
useless, if I can't set a timeout *that works* on that.
ST










______________________________________________________________________________________

La presente comunicazione ed i suoi allegati e' destinata esclusivamente 
ai destinatari. Qualsiasi suo utilizzo, comunicazione o diffusione non 
autorizzata
e' proibita. Se ha ricevuto questa comunicazione per errore, la preghiamo di 
darne 
immediata comunicazione al mittente e di cancellare tutte le informazioni
erroneamente acquisite. (Rif. D.Lgs. 196/2003). Grazie

This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the addressees. 
Any use, 
re-transmission or dissemination not authorized of it is prohibited. If you 
received 
this e-mail in error, please inform the sender immediately and delete all the 
material. 
(Rif. D.Lgs. 196/2003). Thank you.


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to