Thank you Arran and Alan for your feedback. I received confirmation it was not yet implemented on Cisco ASR1k.
-----Original Message----- From: freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco....@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco....@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Arran Cudbard-Bell Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 4:58 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: >> Forgot to mention, also attempted with Acct-Multi-Session-Id, which was in the accounting record but same result. > > I would say to ask the NAS manufacturer for a list of what they need > in the CoA packet, but that doesn't seem to apply here. > > I'm not sure why CoA is so complicated. If there's an > Acct-Session-Id attribute, the NAS should use that to identify a > session. Pretty much every other "session identification" attribute can be ignored. > Some NAS manufacturers require multiple Identification attributes, you really need to ask the manufacturer what attributes and values are required to identify a session. Sometimes you also need a minimum number of policy attributes in addition to the identification attributes. CoA doesn't differentiate between the two types at a packet level its completely implementation specific. -Arran - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html