No No, you didn't understand me...
Mtik is installed on the server (HP ML3xx series) and the optimum is
500-600 online PPPoE users... I achieved 1100 online PPPoE users per
Mikrotik but the CPU load was always to high and the packet loss was to
high (1-2%). The problem is visible because the Mtik creates simple
queue rule for every active connection.
RADIUS server works perfectly with 5 NAS-es (2000-3000 online users in
the same moment)...
I just wanted to know is Mikrotik capable (according to users
experiences) to act as a DHCP server for a large networks (for example
10k modems and 10k users behind those modems).
best regards
Marinko
On 22.2.2012 13:53, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
2012/2/22 Marinko Tarlać<mangi...@gmail.com>:
Hi
Can you tell me something about performances?
I'm using Mtik as NAS for PPPoE users and 500-600 online users per server is
optimum according to my experiences (Quad core server, 2GB RAM,...).
you mean the server is used by FR?
You either:
- setup accouting interim interval to a very low value (e.g. 60 seconds), OR
- your configuration is REALLY non-optimum
If you use files backend, then it's very easy to get several auth/sec.
If you use db backend, then your main limiting factor will be
accounting, which is limited by how fast your disk IOPS is.
So for starters:
- what backend did you use for FR? mysql? postgres? others?
- what kind of disk you have, and how many? (e.g. 2 x SATA 7200 rpm
disks, in hardware raid 1)
- what is your accounting interim interval?
- did you modify the default db schema/queries (if using db backend)?
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
