El 19/11/12 09:15, Fajar A. Nugraha escribió:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Angel L. Mateo <ama...@um.es> wrote:
accounting {
detail
unix
#radutmp
Well, that won't help.
You're trying to use "radwho", but aren't logging accounting
information. That means "radwho" will NEVER show you anything.
I'm not sure about this. I have tried configuration with radutmp
line commented and uncommented. But the fact is that radwho is loggin
information, because radutmp is updated and if I use radwho -F <file> then I
can see is not empty.
That's odd. The only thing writing the utmp file should be accounting
section. Did you perhaps forgot to restart the server after making the
change?
Anyway, from a quick glance at radwho, the relevant change is probably
https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/commit/41960ed2 . If
you know how to reverese a patch and build from source, you can try
reverting the patch (direct patch link:
https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/commit/41960ed2.diff)
and see if it helps. I'm assuming you have a non-empty utmp file
already? If it works, then you found a bug and pinpoint the source. If
it doesn't, then it's something else.
Same configuration, with freeradius 2.2.0 but using radwho from 2.1.8
works. Instead of revert patching the file, I have copied radwho command
from previous folders, and it works without any problem.
So it seems that the problem is that now -F options is mandatory
instead of optional.
If this was the only problem, it wouldn't be any problem, but I'm
having the same problem with radzap:
/usr/bin/radzap -P 131833856 -u <user> -N <ip> localhost <secret>
radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf!
This same configuration with previous versions of radius works without
any problem.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA)
http://www.um.es/atica
Tfo: 868889150
Fax: 868888337
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
