Hi, > Samba 4 is lurvely... apparently 100% compatible with existing AD > installations, although, as always, it's a bit finicky and info is a bit thin > on the ground (and I've not written up a guide when I set my test environment > up that uses an S4 server for EAP-MSCHAPv2). But at least it exists on > RHEL/CentOS as a package.
it can also BE an AD master etc. anyway, you dont know how tempting it was to "yum install samba4" on our production system ;-) I'd certainly like to see some samba3.x versus samba4 benchmarks in this sort of context alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
