I think you are right

I bet you can choose to control FDR locally (clustering?)

2008/8/28 jorge luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Dear Glen, there is something you have to take into account when using FDR
> separately at various regions of a parcelled brain. It do not control de
> Global FDR if the null hypothesis is true in many of these regions.
>
> Although FDR provides strong control of false positives under the null
> hypothesis (similar to FWE) you have again a multiple comparison problem.
>
> See  Langers et al. / NeuroImage 38 (2007) 43–56
>
> Cheers
>
> Jorge
>
> Phd Student
> Laboratory of functional Neuroscience.
> University of Pablo de Olavide. Seville. Spain
>
>
> --- El jue, 28/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
> > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Asunto: [Freesurfer] Re: FDR correction
> > Para: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > Fecha: jueves, 28 agosto, 2008 12:37
>  > Dear Manja,
> >
> > It is statistically valid for the threshold suggested by
> > FDR to vary in
> > the different hemispheres. The reason is that FDR defines a
> > proportion,
> > not an absolute. The FDR procedure suggests a p-value
> > threshold with the
> > property that of all positive results at that threshold,
> > one can expect
> > that no more than X percent are false positives (where X is
> > the desired
> > FDR rate). It is very possible that the threshold with this
> > property would
> > be different in the right compared to the left hemisphere.
> >
> > More informally, one is claiming that of all results
> > declared
> > "significant", X% are probably B.S. Since X is
> > presumably small and the
> > number of results large enough to be interesting, one can
> > safely conclude
> > that the experimental condition explains cortical variation
> > at (most of)
> > the locations indicated. Now divide the brain into
> > subregions (perhaps
> > right and left hemisphere, or perhaps something else) in
> > each of which X%
> > of the significant results are probably false. Then the
> > claim that "X% of
> > the overall results are probably false" is valid.
> >
> >
> > +glenn
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >    Here miracles become marvels, and
> >    marvels recurring wonders.
> >        -- William Beebe
> >
> >    Dr. Glenn Lawyer
> >    +352 661 967 244
> >    Instituttgruppe for psykiatri
> >    Seksjon Vinderen
> >    PB 85 Vinderen
> >    0319 Oslo
> >    http://folk.uio.no/davidgl
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> __________________________________________________
> Correo Yahoo!
> Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
> Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pedro Paulo de M. Oliveira Junior
Diretor de Operações
Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to