Hi Steven,

It has been recommended to me that in case of Tal-check failures, the
use of the -use-mritotal flag will overcome this issue. However, this
substitutes Freesurfer's registration algorithms with a function from
MNI, I believe. In general, I have heard it said that mritotal does a
poorer job, than the freesurfer implementation, thus this may not be
the best option.

In the current version of Freesurfer, as I have been told,
talairach.xfm is needed to compute nu.mgz, [and] talairach stage needs
to precede the nu_correct stage. In my data set, this has led to
poorer registration, and hippocampal segmentations.

At first, I resolved to use mritotal which helped things somewhat.
However, on a recent thread on the list-serve, a modified recon-all
script file was posted by Nick Schmansky that resolves this issue. In
the script are some changes that will be put into the next version
release of Freesurfer, one of which resolves the talairach issue. I
downloaded the script, and replaced the 5.1 version of the recon-all
script. You will find the recon-all script in a message entitled:

[Freesurfer] How to switch order of Talairach and nu-correction stages
in recon-all

As I mentioned, this new recon-all file resolved my issue with poor
hippocampal segmentations


-
Joshua Lee



On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Steven Korycinski <stvk...@umich.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been following an e-mail on this list-serve from Joshua Lee
> regarding poor hippocampal segmentations in Freesurfer 5.1. He
> mentions "using -use-mritotal in the recon-all command to overcome
> tal-check failures" to help fix the segmentation and make them more
> like "those produced by Freesurfer version 4.xx." In light of this
> information, would you recommend that all normal Freesurfer 5.1 users
> add this flag to the recon-all command to help with any segmentation
> errors? Also, at what stage(s) in the reconstruction process should
> the flag be included (ie. recon-all -autorecon1,2, or 3)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to