Thanks so much Louis! This was exactly what I was looking for. The Hinds et al. (2009) paper also has this info.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Louis Nicholas Vinke < vi...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Krista, > I believe the v?.thresh labels are thresholded at p=0.8. This threshold > is based on comparisons of actual and predicted V1 boundary with an > independent dataset. > > Relevant pub: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ftp/articles/ > hinds2008accurate.pdf > > -Louis > > > On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, krista kelly wrote: > > Hi all, >> Can anyone provide information regarding how v1.thresh.label and >> v2.thresh.label that are automatically implemented >> in FreeSurfer are thresholded? >> >> Thanks! >> Krista >> >> >> > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
