Hi Doug,

I was wondering about something. If I have an fsgd file that has no
variable set (just the 2 groups: Diseased and Control) do I need to
include the DefaultVariable line at the end of the file?

Thanks,
Panos

> That's great. Thanks a lot for your help, Doug!
>
>
>>
>> Those are the same things. The way you control for age is to compute a
>> value for both groups at the same age (eg, age=0). If you demean the
>> age, then the difference will be at age=meanage. With DOSS, the
>> difference is always the same regardless of age (which makes it more
>> interpretable)
>> doug
>>
>>
>> On 02/25/2014 03:00 PM, pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your response.
>>> Concerning scenario 2, I believe I have some hard time understanding
>>> the
>>> term intercept. If I'm not mistaken the intercept represents the
>>> cortical
>>> thickness at "age 0." The resulting clusters by using a design matrix
>>> of
>>> [1 -1 0 0]  will give me the areas where the intercept is significantly
>>> different between the Diseased group and the healthy group.
>>>
>>>   Are those clusters the same clusters that have a different mean
>>> regional
>>> cortical thickness in Diseased versus Healthy subjects after
>>> controlling
>>> for age, or are those two completely different things?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Panos
>>>
>>>> On 02/25/2014 02:07 PM, pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>>>>> Hi FS community,
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a few questions regarding my understanding of the group
>>>>> analysis
>>>>> in FS:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) If I use an fsgd file with Two Groups (One Factor/Two Levels), No
>>>>> Covariates, and my contrast matrix is [1 -1], do the resulting
>>>>> clusters
>>>>> (if any) show the regional significant differences between the two
>>>>> groups
>>>>> by comparing just the means of the values that I am comparing? For
>>>>> instance, if I'm comparing cortical thickness between a diseased and
>>>>> a
>>>>> control group, is this going to give me the clusters where the
>>>>> Diseased
>>>>> subjects' (no age included in the fsgd file, just the two groups)
>>>>> mean/regional cortical thickness differs significantly from the
>>>>> controls'?
>>>>> In other words, is a 50 yo subject's mean/regional cortical thickness
>>>>> going to be treated the same as a 80 yo subject's?
>>>> Yes, just a simple two-group t-test.
>>>>> 2) Now suppose that I would like to control for age. Then I'm
>>>>> assuming
>>>>> that I need to create an fsgd file with two Groups (One Factor/Two
>>>>> Levels)
>>>>> and One Covariate (age). Similarly, if I would want to visualize the
>>>>> differences in the regional values of cortical thickness between the
>>>>> two
>>>>> groups but after they have been controlled/adjusted for age, what
>>>>> contrast
>>>>> matrix should I use? Normally I would use [0 0 1 -1] but this will
>>>>> give
>>>>> me
>>>>> the significant differences in the age slopes not the mean values,
>>>>> unless
>>>>> I am missing something here.
>>>> Correct, that will give you the difference in age/thickness slopes.
>>>> You
>>>> could do [1 -1 0 0] to give you the difference in intercepts. A better
>>>> way, is to first look for differences in the slopes. If you do not
>>>> find
>>>> any, then rerun with DOSS with a contrast of [1 -1 0]. By using a
>>>> DOSS,
>>>> the difference in intercept is always constant regardless of age (as
>>>> opposed to DODS).
>>>> doug
>>>>> Thanks in advance for your help and sorry for the lengthy message.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Panos
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>>> MGH-NMR Center
>>>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>>>> Fax: 617-726-7422
>>>>
>>>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>>>> FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>>>> www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>>> Outgoing:
>>>> ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>> MGH-NMR Center
>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>> Fax: 617-726-7422
>>
>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>> FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>> www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>> Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to