Dear Petr,
the volumes from the subfields are in voxels. Since the voxels are 0.5mm 
isotropic, their volumes is (1/8) cubic millimeters. Therefore, you need to 
divide the volumes by 8 to convert to mm3.
Kind regards,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Postdoctoral researcher BCBL
www.jeiglesias.com
www.bcbl.eu

Legal disclaimer/Aviso legal/Lege-oharra: www.bcbl.eu/legal-disclaimer


----- Original Message -----
From: "zach petr" <zach.p...@post.cz>
To: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 4:05:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FS volume discrepancies




Thanks for reply. But adding subfield volumes together leads to too high number 
compared to overall hippocampus volume. Like 9500 mm3 compared to 2.1 mm3. 

Petr 


---------- Původní zpráva ---------- 
Od: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
Komu: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
Datum: 15. 4. 2014 14:35:13 
Předmět: Re: [Freesurfer] FS volume discrepancies 


>From Eugenio: 
------------------------ 
Dear Petr, 
at this point, the hippocampal subfield module is - to some extent - 
independent from the whole hippocampal segmentation. The values you will 
obtain from adding the subfield volumes together will be around 15% lower 
than the volumes from aseg.stat, but they will still be very highly 
correlated. 
Kind regards, 
------------------------ 

On 
Tue, 
15 Apr 2014, zach.p...@post.cz wrote: 

> 
> I have several issues concerning automated volumes calculation. When you 
> look at the aseg.stat for hippocampal volume (in mm3) it gives different 
> value compared to hippocampal subfields volume calculation (which comes in 
> voxels but there is stated that 1 voxel is 0.5mm3). How is it possible? I 
> presume that anatomical definition and subfield incorporation is the same. 
> 
> Next - if you look at the whole hippocampal formation volume in hippocampal 
> subfield calculations it is way lower compared to the summation of the 
> CA1-CA4 + dentate gyrus = hippocampal formation. What could be explanation 
> of this? 
> 
> Petr 
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________ 
Freesurfer mailing list 
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
at 
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error 
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
properly 
dispose of the e-mail. 
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to