Hi Tudor

1. The smoothing we do is along the surface, so no matter how huge the kernel gets it only ever includes cortical gray matter. In contrast, volume smoothing kernels will happily smooth in white matter, skull, csf, the bore of the scanner, etc.... as the kernels get big.

2. Yes, we have a template, but it is a geometric one and not simply an average, so part of the advantage is higher dimensional nonlinear warping (which also exists in the volume), but part is that we register based on cortical folding patterns not image intensities, so folds are much more likely to align across subjects (and architectonic areas as well)

cheers
Bruce


On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tudor Popescu wrote:

Hi all,

If I understand correctly, the surface-based morphometry (SBM) done by
Freesurfer offers superior registration as compared to voxel-based methods
such as VBM, in that:
1. "SBM smoothing respects anatomical boundaries better than the 3D VBM
smoothing".
2.  "SBM group analysis employs inter-subject alignment based on the
patterns of sulci and gyri, as opposed to Talairach registration, which
often ignores sulcal/gyral landmarks"

I'm not sure I understand those reasons, however. For 1., why does the
smoothing operation (basically, a multiplication) "care" about anatomy or
registration at all, such that it can be said it is better done in SBM vs
VBM?
And for 2., doesn't the Talairach registration used in VBM simply imply a
certain target template? Surely such a template is used in SBM registration
as well, and if that is the case, then how are sulcal/gyral landmarks taken
into account?

Thanks for any help!

Tudor

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to