Dear Bruce,

no, both ?h.orig.nofix and ?h.orig are ok (respecting my wm.mgz edits), but 
only ?h.white (result of mris_make_surfaces) is not ok (leaking to regions 
where wm.mgz has value 1).

Regards,

Antonin



> Hi Antonin  
  
> if it is correct in the orig.nofix but not correct in the orig that means   
> it was an incorrectly fixed topological defect that you need to manually   
> correct. I'll see if we can find someone here to take a look.  
> Bruce  

On Wed, 29 Jul   
2015, Antonin Skoch wrote:  
  
> Dear experts,  
>   
> during the manual correction of freesurfer reconstruction I encountered 
> following  
> problem:  
>   
> White surface did not follow gray / white matter boundary probably partly due 
> to  
> skullstrip error and partly to the insufficient local gray/white matter 
> contrast.  
> I tried to fix it by editing wm.mgz, in some cases it worked well, but in 
> some  
> cases white surface "does not respect" my wm.mgz editing and still leaks out 
> to  
> the areas where wm.mgz has value 1.  
> The problem is probably at the level of recon-all -white since orig.nofix.mgz 
> and  
> orig.mgz are OK - does well follow my edits and does not leak to areas with  
> wm.mgz = 1.  
> I tried to put some control points to these areas but it still did not help 
> (the  
> brainmask.mgz at most of the problematic areas has intensity 110). Processing 
> the  
> data by development version did not help either.?  
>   
> I have uploaded 2 examples to your ftp file exchange:  
>   
> not_corrected_wm_1  
> - slice 96 in coronal view, right hemisphere, at the convexity  
> - slices 97-98, 103, 107,108, in coronal view,? left hemisphere, at the 
> convexity  
>   
> not_corrected_wm_2  
> - slices 78 in coronal view, right hemisphere, 2 areas at the convexity  
> - slices 79-83 in coronal view, two quite large areas in both hemispheres at 
> the  
> convexity  
> - slices 88-95 in coronal view, quite large areas at righ hemispheres at the  
> convexity  
>   
> and other areas in following slices, there are quite large amount of them in 
> this  
> subject.  
>   
> Could you please look at the data to find where could be the problem?  
>   
> Thank you very much for all your help.  
>   
> Best regards,  
>   
> Antonin Skoch  
>   
>  
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to