The values in wmparc.stats will have partial volume correction. The
onesfrom fslstats will not.
On 9/12/15 3:44 PM, John Anderson wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Kindly I want to inquire about the _difference between_ white matter
volume generated by freesurfer ( specifically the white matter
parcellations volume mentioned in wmparc.stats) and the vwhite matter
volume generated by other tools like fslstats.
For example:
If I use a binarized mask from wmparc.mgz for the precentral gyrus in
the command : fslstats -i MPRAGE.nii.gz ( reoriented and skull
stripped) -k <Precentral gyrus mask> -V
Then
What is the differecne between this volume generated by "fslstats" and
the precenral gyrus volume mentioned in wmparc.stats. Which one is
more accurate?
Bests,
John Anderson
Senior Research Associate
Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 4and the white matter volume generated by other
methods like using fslstats19 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH
03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834
Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
