Hi Bruce,

I got no answer to my questions below with files provided thanks to
FileDrop.

Could you tell me if you received these questions and associated files ?

Thanks in advance !

Best regards,
Matthieu

2015-12-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Matthieu Vanhoutte <matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com>:

> Hi Bruce,
>
> Exactly I want to be sure that I process my data in the same way, so not
> introduce bias with partially use of -bigventricles option.
>
> 1) I tried the recon-all process on AD patient with big ventricles and
> atrophy with and without the -bigventricles option. I am not pretty sure of
> which process is the best in terms of segmentation according the aseg.mgz ?
> (I'll send you T1 and aseg.mgz for the two process)
> 2) Considering cortical atrophy, a lot of gray matter hasn't been taken
> account in the cortex segmentation. Is there an automatic way to improve
> the cortical segmentation in case of visible atrophy ?
>
> Best regards,
> Matthieu
>
>
> 2015-12-03 18:03 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>
>> Hi Matthie
>>
>> do you find that it doesn't work well without bigventricles? You just
>> want to be sure that you process your data in the same way so there is no
>> bias in the results. We have found that most early AD cases work fine
>> without needing special flags. It's more for late stage AD or
>> hydrocephalus
>> and such.
>>
>> cheers
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Matthieu
>> Vanhoutte wrote:
>>
>> > Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>> >
>> > My question is in the title. I'm working on Alzheimer case where most
>> of the cases have large
>> > ventricles. Is it better in general use to apply -bigventricles option
>> on all subjects (for
>> > homogeneous calculus or something like that...) or to distinct subtle
>> cases of patients with not so
>> > big ventricles ?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance for helping !
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Matthie
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to