Correction: each label was thresholded to have the same area as the average area across ex vivo subjects. The thresholds are different based on how spread out the distribution is.
On 07/16/2018 01:35 PM, Douglas N. Greve wrote: > > This is something new in 6.0. The "thresh" version is the label > thesholded such that the likelihood of a vertex being in the given > label is at least 10%. > > > On 07/10/2018 03:04 AM, Jason Bruggemann wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> I ran a batch in order to tabulate the FreeSurfer stats from our data >> set, but error logs indicated that the usual "?h.BA.stats" files were >> missing. It appears that these files were not generated, and instead >> we have "?h.BA_exvivo.stats" and "?h.BA_exvivo.thresh.stats". So I am >> not exactly sure what these are, but a mail archive search suggested >> that these are associated with the developer version of FreeSurfer? >> ...or perhaps this is just something new in FS Version 6.0.0? >> >> >> We are currently running: >> freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0-2beb96c >> >> >> Any advice appreciated... >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Jason >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
