That would be caused either by your application hanging up or it being
the last thing in the sessions list of applications to run
Mike
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Alois Komenda wrote:
Hello,
I have written an implementation of the switch_application_interface.
Now I noticed, that after the execution of the application_function
the session is hung up automatically.
Can I take any influence on this behavior? I don't want the session
to be closed in some cases. Applications, which are called in the
future, should be able to work with this session.
For example the first application decides what to do with a session.
And the second one bridges it to an endpoint.
Is that possible at all?
Thanks in advance!
Alois Komenda
Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für Systeme der Kommunikationstechnik ESK
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-dev mailing list
Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-dev mailing list
Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org
