no it wouldn't When the channel is not in use it's down..... it's absent of any activity and not running in the state machine.
This terminology is for the sake of the coder not the guy using the code. On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IDLE would make more sense. > > /b > > On Sep 19, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Michael Jerris wrote: > > > in openzap, state down is like on-hook... we should change that name > > maybe. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ AIM: anthm MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/888 googletalk:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pstn:213-799-1400
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
