Oh, wow. I haven't even started to get into STUN yet. So far, FS has just worked beautifully without STUN.
-N On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Brian West wrote: > Well not if they are configured properly and use stun... It shouldn't > ever be the responsibility of the registrar to overcome broken > clients... thats how we got into this SIP mess in the first place. > > /b > > On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Noah Silverman wrote: > >> Ok, >> >> But don't I need the aggressive nat detection since most of my >> clients >> will be behind nat?? >> >> -N > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
