okay, this confirms my suspicion and that the fix is correct. let us know.
Mike On Nov 20, 2008, at 6:37 PM, kokoska.rokoska wrote: > Michael Jerris napsal(a): >> I added some code to protect against this segfault in svn revision >> 10483, but it seems like you are getting an invalid presence packet. >> Can you update and test and make sure it doesn't segfault anymore, >> and >> paste a sip trace of the message that causes this issue? >> >> Mike >> >> > > Thank you very much, Mike, for your fix! > > It looks like it helps. I do more tests tomorow (I am at CET). > > Presence message is as follows: > > PUBLISH sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 > Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CSeq: 1 PUBLISH > From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=72e3e8d1 > To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > [my:ip:6]:5060;branch=z9hG4bK88cce6e78dff940d328b676e13ae321d > Max-Forwards: 70 > Content-Type: application/pidf+xml > Expires: 300 > Event: presence > User-Agent: SIP Communicator 1.0-alpha3-nightly.build.1519 Windows XP > Content-Length: 423 > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><presence > xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" > xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" > xmlns:rpid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" > entity="sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"><dm:person > id="p8285"><rpid:activities/></dm:person><tuple > id="t1998"><status><basic>open</basic></status><contact>sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > </contact><note>Online</note></tuple></presence> > > And on pcap dump I see ICMPv6 response unreachable (Port unreachable), > but FreeSWITCH works ok and process calls on both IPv4 and even IPv6. _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
