Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Steve Underwood <ste...@coppice.org> wrote: > >> Depends what you are after. Speex offers the quality of G.729 at around >> the same processing load. However, nobody seems to want to pay for the >> processing load of G.729. Almost everything uses G.729A. Half the >> processing load, but significantly poorer quality. >> > > Throughout most of this thread I've been using G.729 and G.729a > interchangeably. That's sloppy on my part. Most of the time I meant > G.729a because that is what most people (everyone?) uses. > > I was under the impression the quality difference wasn't that > significant. I can't say if I've ever knowingly used "true" G.729. > It certainly doesn't help that G.729a is allegedly completely > compatible with G.729, to the point where I don't think it's even > valid to use "G.729a" or annexa in an SDP... > There is no reason whatsoever to differentiate between G.729 and G.729A in the SDP as the bit streams are 100% compatible. Annex A data is just encoded and decoded in less optimal ways.
Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org