On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:24 AM, John Dalgliesh <jo...@defyne.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 at 10:42 -0700, Michael Collins wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Michael Giagnocavo <m...@giagnocavo.net >> >wrote: >> >>> >>> Exactly. You probably want to have something like this anyways, so that >>> when someone accidentally unplugs the system, or the disks/CPU/RAM crash, >>> you’re not stuck. >>> >>> >>> >>> That is, until FreeSWITCH can record its internal state to some >>> inter-machine memory so we can have hot failover. ;) >>> >>> >>> >>> I think that's going to be in 1.0.5. :) >> > > I'm still too much of a noob to be certain that's a joke :) ... but FS core > already does record much of its internal state... to a DB, right? It just > has to not clear that out on startup and problem solved! > It was a joke. :)
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
